#Photo supreme vs lightroom smart albums pro#

I scanned in all of my wife's printed photographs (pre-digital era) and even some old tin types and glass negatives her family had. My master folder of every image I have (RAW's and jpg's when I didn't shoot RAW) is 436GB. standalone (and I know they clearly spelled it out, but I can still dislike it). It's more of wanting to change because of what Adobe is doing with the CC subs vs. I'm happy enough with the processing in Lightroom, since I'm just a hobbyist, it's good enough. I don't want separate catalogs or programs, as I want every image searchable and in one place.

My goal is to basically have a single program that does my photo management and editing. I was going to download it as soon as I have some time to devote to vetting it. Has anyone made the jump (either way) and have opinions on it? Is the grass greener on one side (and less water color-y) than the other? One option would be to just Export everything I've processed in Lightroom to either jpg or tif, but I'm not sure I want that since jpg's will lose quality and the tif files will be bigger than the original RAF files. Now that my catalog is much much bigger, I for sure don't want to do that all again. I remember going from Bibble to Lightroom and having to re-process all the images that I cared about, which was a pain. My question I guess is, has anyone done this and was it 'good enough' for most photos?

#Photo supreme vs lightroom smart albums pro#

With that, I've read that Capture 1 Pro 8 has an 'Import from Lightroom' option that will bring over all the metadata and even some of the processing data for images. I love Lightroom, but I'm not a fan of Adobe. I'm not a fan of the game Adobe is playing with the CC vs.

Recently though, I've been curious about an alternative. I've been an avid Lightroom user since version 3 (Bibble before that, until it was ruined by Corel).